It is unlikely to be a coincidence that over the last few weeks at least three Baganda Internet outlets, with strong pro-Buganda and pro-Kabaka positions have been hacked. These include www.ngomaradio.com, www.theugandacitizen.com and www.bugandapost.com.  We have not yet been able to independently confirm information from our readers in Uganda and London that the Museveni’s occupation  government is paying an Internet consulting company to continuously hack anti-NRM and anti-Museveni websites. However, for the time being, the operators of BugandaPost.com are working on the assumption that the Ugandan warlord have taken his genocidal oppression of Baganda to cyberspace.

This writer has attempted to access Ngoma Radio using five different types of browsers and in all cases the radio no longer plays. In the Apple Safari browser, even some of the text and images appear distorted. The Uganda Citizen site, is totally down and you get an error message when you attempt to access it.

Buganda Post has been attacked four times in as many weeks (see “Buganda Post Hacked By Unknown Hooligans“). It is now only reliably available using MS Explorer 7 or higher.  Also, the Opinions section is yet to be reconstructed after it was corrupted by the hacking. The chief moderator and editor, Omulongo Nakato, is working around the clock to get a permanent solution.  According to reports from the UK, the operators of Ngoma Radio are similarly working hard to get the radio online as soon as possible.  This writer has not yet been able to reliably establish who operates Ngoma Radio.

For the whole month of October and part of November this year, Buganda Post has been the target of numerous cyber attacks.  First, malicious software was clandestinely placed on our server, to corrupt our news stories. That was followed by attempts to electronically take over the Buganda Post website. Finally, malicious softer code was inserted into the website disguised as comments, to make search engines like Google warn users that Buganda Post is a dangerous site.

After a lot of hard work, the site has been enhanced and restored to clean up the website. At least 80% of the stories are fully accessible and work to restore the rest of content is moving ahead.

Omulongo Nakato, the chief Buganda Post, moderator and editor told this writer: “We want Buganda Post readers and our supporters to  know a few things. First, we are very thankful to all of you who sent us emails of support and even made suggestions on how to deal with the problem. We have enhanced and hardened Buganda Post to make it much harder to hack using the same tricks as our attackers used.  However, we now know that Buganda Post is ‘bad news’ for some people and they want to disable it. So, are going to be much more vigilant in protecting the website.  We will also research how we might get some income from the site to pay for its security.”

Omulongo Nakato revealed that she does not know who is attacking the site.  She said: “The truth is that we do not know the hooligans at this time. What we know is that there are many possible attackers, all the way from thousands of career cyberspace criminals to anti-Buganda individuals and to members of dictator Museveni’s ISO and ESO.  What I can says is that we will have everything restored and much more secure by next week.  Once more, we are very grateful to our loyal readers, Baganda and our relatives and  our friends.”

Send you letters to letters@bugandapost.com as a text email or MS Word document. They must not exceed 500 words in length. If you want us to withhold your name, write WITHOLD next to it.

If you have an image, audio or video to accompany your letter we will also include it, provided it meets our standards for copyright protection. Send it as an attachment or as a URL link.

We are not obligated to publish any letter. We shall only publish letters that we consider appropriate and suitable for our readership. Click here to see the About page for more information on our terms regarding the content on Buganda Post.

Boston, USA: Ttabamiruka, Where NRM has Become a Dirty Word

Fellow Ugandans,

The country now more than ever is in dire need for independent minded thinkers to get us out of the quagmire of corruption, self destruction, unemployment and to improve the delivery of services in all sectors of our government albeit from a pool of the unencumbered, foresight third eye of the country.

The diaspora is made up of many disenfranchised capable hands, not so easily corruptible and with the potential to transform our nation, as long as that threshold of trust is reached without breach or violation as witnessed in these UNAA campaigns.

Some here have argued that President Museveni has surrounded himself with many yes men and women, who simply allow his continued sailing without alarm, stiffness or warning of looming danger from policies pursued; the president of UNAA should not to be in the same camp.

UNAA is one of the remaining organizations where civil exchange and honest to God, dialogue regarding deferred hopes, aspirations and expectations for tangible progress can still be heard uncensored.

Muzzling this discourse of reason and dissent, while desperately searching for a tenable position of development can only have dire consequences for our beloved country.

This obsession to sniff out and snobbishly infiltrate an organization with the desire to take over, despite repeated pleas,  not to meddle, will spoil the effectiveness of such organs to provide venting space for those disgruntled and disenchanted with the way things have been handled  in the country for the last twenty some years.

There are many among us in the diaspora who question the genius and preoccupation of buying men simply to make them blind followers rather than to seek them out for more erudite matters of thought and skill.

NRM strategists, ought to know that many of us in the diaspora tend to pear behind the rosy façade, often exposing the party line for what it is.

Further more we have acquired an appetite for verifiable honesty in dialogue and that is what we expect from our leadership.

We cringe when we see the out muscling of ordinary folks to impose non-progressive figure heads with blinders, bent on killing the free will and spirit of Ugandans, thus alienating those who might have added value to the development of the country.

The reality of the matter is: NRM needs the diaspora to inject not just cash but added wisdom to change the course of our nation. However, many in the diaspora want to work with honest brokers, those with a serious willingness to address and resolve critical issues that have dogged us for decades.

If such rules of engagement are not established, a Ttabamiruka, like scenario, where mention of the NRM-has become a dirty word, will ultimately ensue, resulting in a more parochial approach to development.

I would much rather see the prevalence of cool heads and practical dialogue, especially among the southerners, where lately there has been too much posturing of grown up men, baited and preoccupied with matters irrelevant to progress, put to the forefront by enemies of the state for purposes of disagreement.

Such agents of confusion have to be recognized for what they are, and I will repeat this call for a tribal ombudsman to bring a cessation to the polarization of Ugandans along tribal lines.

Remember, It is not how you get to the top, it matters most who you get there  with.

Tendo Kaluma

Ugandan in Boston

Send you letters to letters@bugandapost.comas a text email or MS Word document. They must not exceed 500 words in length. If you want us to withold your name write WITHOLD next to it.

If you have an image, audio or video to accompany your letter we will also include it, provided it meets our standards for copyright protection. Send it as an attachment or as a URL link.

We are not obligated to publish any letter. We shall only publish letters which we consider appropriate and suitable for our readership. Click here to see the About page for more information on our terms regarding the content on Buganda Post.

Boston, USA: Okutuwandiisa ye Chance ya Mengo Okutulaga

Nasanyuse nnyo okusoma mu Monitor news paper nti Mengo agenda okuwandiisa Abaganda mu bika byaffe.  Tukyetaaga nnyo nnyo, nga jenkomye. Ate nga nzijukira nti bwetwali tukyaali ku campus (ate Lubega Sseggona ye yali Ssentebe waffe mu Za Mbogo)  omulimu guno gwali gwatandikibwaako Ssabasajja. Era twagendako ku mwoleso mu Lubiri newabaawo abantu Omuwanika JB Walusimbi (kati Katikkiro) beyaleeta okulaga computer z’okuwadiisa Abaganda. Abamu kuffe twajuzaamu ne form era  ebitufaako nebabiyingiza awo wenyini.  Era ddala ng’olaba nti byaali bikolera ddala nga bino ebya Massachusetts wano mu US. Kale egyo emyaka giri mu 10 oba nokusoba emabega naye byafiira awo , n’abaali babikola tetwabamanya.

Kati ekibuuzo kiri nti, lwaaki ku luno ebintu tebikolebwa mu musana? Ku mulembe guno ogwa technology n’omwana omuto akimanyi nti tetusobola kuwandiisa Baganda bukadde 6 nga tukozesa  bu notebook. Mungeri yeemu tetusobola  kukola mulimu guno ku nkola ya “Ndaba muwala wagundi yasoma computer, tumugezeeko.” Twetaaga enkola ey’omusana, Mengo ayite Abaganda abalina obumanyirivu mu mirimu nga gino, okuva mu nsi zonna, bavuganye ne zi proposals (Technical ne Financial) era z’ekenyezebwe akakiiko akaliko Abaganda abazito nga Emmanuel Cardinal Wamala eyawumula,  Judge Julia Sebutinde, Judge Daniel Nsereko Ntanda, Judge Solome Bossa awamu n’Abataka abategeera obulungi technology nga Nakirembeka ne Namwama.

Eno ye chance yabakulembeze baffe e Mengo okulaga nti balina enjawulo okuva banaffe bali abayita gavumenti ya Ssabasajja NGO.  Kubanga ffe Abaganda tetukyasobola kugumikiriza bukulembeze obw’okukukuta. Ssenga omulimu guno gukolebwa obulungi Mengo ajja kuwa nnyo Ssabasajja ekitiibwa ate n’abaliyo baganje gyetuli.

Abakungu ba Kabaka mbagala mwena era mbasabira kubanga omulimu si mutene. Naye ate mbakakasa nti senga binabeera mu musana dollar zange nja kuzitoola.

Awangaale nnyo Ssabasajja Kabaka Baffe.

M. Nakayiza
Boston, USA

Kampala, Buganda: Dump Blog Post About Google in Luganda

Hullo Friend, I humbly ask you to dump your blog post about Google Uganda in Luganda.  It is a privilege that Google considered Luganda language.  It is also rude of you to post such a post on “BugandaPost” even if it is yours personal.  I have known Baganda for working out solutions not decrying/criticizing without contacting.

It is good that you noticed the errors, but not wise to publicize them more-so on Buganda Post.

The gentleman Jon Gosier, whose team volunteered, did this for the nation’s and people’s good. Please, I request you to drop that article for the good.

Kwagala Derrrick
Kampala
Mob: +256 782 420989, +256 772 712716

In a letter which a New York based Muganda analysts has called “clear evidence that Museveni is a tired, drowning and anti-Ganda man who Baganda must avoid at all times”, the Uganda strongman called Baganda sub imperialists who grabbed Bunyoro land and turned it into mailo land. Mr. Museveni’s letter, seen by many Baganda as an unveiled anti-Ganda hate campaign, has been read more than once on government radio stations.

In the unsolicited public letter to his own minister of Presidency, Museveni says that the purpose of his memo is “to guide you [the minister] in the tasks you are [she is] to handle in the matter of the Banyoro-Bafuriki question in Bunyoro Region.” Bafuruki are Bakiga, Balaalo, Banyankore and other westerners who have migrated to Bunyoro over the last few decades. Over the last 10 years, the so-called Kibaale district has experienced sporadic land wars between Banyoro and Bafuruki, sometimes resulting in big losses of human life and property.

Mr. Museveni described the problem as, “the modus vivendus between the Banyoro and the Bafuruki in terms of land, and political rights.” (NOTE: Mr. Museveni probably meant to say modus vivendi). Elaborating further, the Uganda strongman claims that the problem has three major elements:

• The land grabbed by the British colonialists and their Mengo-sub imperialists and turned into Mailo land.
• Former public land currently occupied by the Bafuruki; and
• Threatened political marginalization of the indigenous groups of the area (Buyaga and Bugangaizi) – Banyoro, Bagungu, Bachope, Baruuli, Banyara, and, curiously, the Bahima/Balaalo.

Later in his letter, Mr. Museveni, prescribes what he calls nine principles to be part of the solution. Those principles include the following two:

• Reserving elected district and sub-county (LC 5 and LC 3) political leadership positions for indigenous people of Bunyoro.
• Evicting all illegal encroachers in forest reserves without compensation and re-settling the gun toting nomadic cattle keepers (Balaalo) of Buliisa in Buganda (being done already).

As he concludes his letter, Museveni asserts that: “All this [Bunyoro land violence] is a consequence of the colonial policies also supported by the traditional chiefs like of Mengo in Uganda, of discouraging the use of Swahili as a national language. If the people of Bunyoro-the Banyoro or the Bafuruki were using Swahili, their differences would be submerged. It is the use of vernacular that provokes, in part, these contradictions.”

Commenting on Mr. Museveni’s letter, our New York based Muganda analysts said: “This is clear evidence that Museveni is a tired, drowning and anti-Ganda man who Baganda must avoid at all times. First, he tells you that Banyoro should have a monopoly on political leadership in their kingdom and controversial Balaalo must be resettled elsewhere. And when it comes to Buganda, he says that Kampala should be expanded to over 30% of Buganda so that non-Baganda can take and get a monopoly on political leadership in that part of Buganda. He also openly tells you that the problem gun toting Balaalo from Bunyoro are being resettled in Buganda – overtly courting genocide in Buganda.

“This man’s disease, whatever it is, has reached the brain. That is why Mengo must emulate Kabaka Mutebi and totally avoid this man. There is so much Buganda can do to advance, even under the current ‘occupied’ status, without talking to this genocide courting man. The challenge for Buganda is to get out of the ‘reactive’ (Museveni yagambye ki?) mode of operation and get into a ‘work according to our plan’ (Museveni yatomera) mode. Museveni is a tired, drowning man; if you stay too close to him, he might grab you and take you under with him.”

We have reproduced president Museveni’s unedited letter below (without effort to correct any spelling and grammar errors) below:

PO/16.34

15^TH July, 2008
Copy received Office of the minister of internal affairs

To the Minister in charge of the Presidency

Hon Beatrice Wabudeya, Minister of the Presidency

RE: Guidance on Banyoro Bafuuriki question.

This is to guide you in the tasks you are to handle in the matter of the Banyoro-Bafuriki question in Bunyroro Region. You should, first of all, define the problem. What is the problem? The problem, obviously, is the modus vivendus between the Banyoro and the Bafuriki in terms of land, and political rights.

This is on top of the old problem of the British Colonialists and Mengo sub-imperialists that grabbed land from Banyoro and engaged in a genocide in the region, resulting into the depopulation of the area. This means, essentially, three elements in the problem.

●The land grabbed by the British colonialists and their Mengo-sub imperialists and turned into Mailo land.

●The land currently being occupied by the Bafuruki that was part of the former public land including the forest reserve, beyond the original settlements of Luteete (Rutete) and Kisiita that were promoted by the government without foreseeing the consequences; and

●The resultant threatened political marginalization of the indigenous groups of the area-The Banyoro, the Bagungu, the Bachope, the Baruuli, Banyara, and the Bahiima.

We, the NRM members, being nationalists and panafricanists, cannot undermine our vision and program by associating ourselves with the vulgarized versions of “national integration.”

Genuine national integration must include scrupulous respect of everybody’s rights to the land of their heritage, politics, and culture. To do otherwise, is, actually, to undermine our vision and program. It is to make the threatened groups resent or even resist, legitimately, our invaluable vision. In any situation, we should always ask ourselves “where is justice in this case?” The NRM must always fight of justice -for just causes.  I am not, for instance, a monarchist. The area of Ankole, where I come from, is, obviously, thriving without a monarchy. Nevertheless, you remember that I spearheaded the restoration of monarchies in the parts of Uganda that wanted them. This was part of my nationalism and part of my panafricanism eventually.

Therefore, in the case of the Bunyoro Region, it is clear that the Banyoro are legitimately there because that is their origin. The Bafuuriki are also legitimately there because some were settled there by the central government, or, the Late Sir Tito Winyi while others have, subsequently, bought land from the original Bafuuriki, the Banyoro, or the absentee Mengo landlords. If the indigenous Banyoro had not been bled by colonialism and Mengo sub-imperialism, such an infusion of Bafuuriki would not have caused disequilibrium.

The Ankole-Mpororo area (Ankole, Rukungiri and Kanungu) is such an example. There, the Bafuuriki were settled in the amahamba (unoccupied wilderness) but the indigenous population remained in the core part of the area in large numbers. The Bafuuriki in such cases are, actually, an advantage for the areas. There can only be some minor problems like those affecting the Banyabutumbi a sub-group of the Banyakore Bahororo that used to live in Imaramagambo forest. The issues of such groups should also be addressed in a conscious way using administrative actions before they become radicalized.

The vulgarized version of integration goes like this: “We are Ugandans and we all have equal inherent rights in all parts of Uganda”-right to property, all political rights such as competing for political offices. That is correct as long as you ensure that in exercise of those inherent rights, you do not fundamentally damage the legitimate inherent rights of others- especially of those indigenous to the area. If that happens, the central government must come in to regulate the enjoyment of the inherent rights of the respective groups so that disequilibrium does not develop or become entrenched.

To throw more light on the incorrectness of the vulgarized version of integration, I would like to pose some few questions.

(i)           If the Bafuuriki dominate political space in the area to which they migrated, where do the indigenous people of the area find another political space?

(ii)          If the Bafuuriki were more nationalistic, why could they not find some person among the indigenous people and vote for them?

(iii)        Can some people from indigenous groups successfully compete, politically in the areas of origin of the Bafuuriki? If not, is this not unequal relationship?

(iv)         Suppose we were to infuse 100,000 Bafuuriki into Acholi or Karamoja, what would be the reaction? If the Acholis and Karamajongs were to react violently, would it mean that they are not Ugandan enough or would it be that the policy was wrong?

Horizontal rural migration by peasants after they have exhausted land in one area is not a progressive way of creating national integration. The more correct way is vertical migration, from the farm to the factory. That is why the factories should be detribalization centres through the use of Swahili on the work site.

Some people confuse normal individual migration with the mass insertion of big groups into an already enfeebled population on account of history. These are easy to distinguish from what we are talking about in Bunyoro. In 1955 the Banyankore (through their Ishengero) elected Hon. Kapa an immigrant from Rwanda as their first MP along with Hon. Katiti. This was positive and, besides, Kapa was a munyakorenised mufuuriki. He was, therefore, capable of defending the multidimentional interests of the Banyakore groups that is economic, political and cultural. Is this not different from a situation where two significant but different cultural groups are precipitately juxtaposed with each other? Is the situation in Bunyoro unique or otherwise?

Having thought about all this for a long time, I am proposing the following principles to be part of the solutions.

1.     Ring-fencing the LC 5 positions in the whole of Bunyoro region for the indigenous people; and also ring-fencing the sub-county leadership in the whole of Bunyoro.

2.    Ring-fencing the positions of Member of Parliament in the whole of Bunyoro region for the indeginous people except for the special constituencies created around Rutete (Lutete) and Kisita resettlement schemes. Number and two will in the spirit of article of 9 and article 10 of the 1995 Constitution of Uganda. They were also envisaged by article 32 of the constitution of Uganda which talked about affirmative action in favour of marginalized groups by reason of history or otherwise for the purpose of redressing imbalances that exist against them.

3.    All the indigenous people that were on the Mailo land in 1964 should be granted ownership and the absentee landlords should leave the land. All the indeginous people that have been on public land should get titles ownership of that land. The Bafuuriki in the settlement schemes already have their land and should get titles if they do not have them. The Bafuuriki who bought land legally should have their rights recognized.

4.    All the illegal encroachers in forest reserves should be evicted without compensation as the normadic cattle keepers of Buliisa are being settled in Buganda.

5.    The towns and trading centre should be exempted from these affirmative action measures. They should be free for all Ugandans. This is the healthy integration. The totally integrated Uganda should have its nucleus in the urban centers, factories, the hotels, the shops, the real estate etc. in oreder to promote healthy integration, industrialization should be promoted to pull redundant population from rural areas to the urban areas. Here there should be no regulation beyond ensuring that the workers are Ugandans.

6.    The indigenous people who get land should be prohibited from selling the land for 20years and also leasing it.

7.    A program of sensitising the Banyoro and Bafuuriki should be promoted.

8.    Government should have a special program for developing Bunyoro using money provided by the central government including the British funds.

9.    Finally there should a sunset clause to terminate or cause a review of this policy after 20years.

All this is a consequence of the colonial policies also supported by the traditional chiefs like of Mengo in Uganda, of discouraging the use of Swahili as a national language. If the people of Bunyoro-the Banyoro or the Bafuuriki were using Swahili, their differences would be submerged. It is the use of vernacular that provokes, in part, these contradictions. I like the indeginous languages, in fact I am about to complete a dictionary in Runyakore-Rukiga. However, I see these vanaculars not as an end in themselves. I see them as a source of enriching Swahili. That is why NRM promotes Swahili. We included it in the constitution; we use it in the army etc.

The committee, should, therefore, look at the principles I have mentioned above and see them work. You should also identify any other problems that I have not identified and propose solutions. You should propose any solutions you feel are useful in the areas for which I have suggested solutions.

Yoweri K. Museveni.

President

Copied to VP, PM, all Members of Cabinet Subcommittee of Bunyoro Issues, Head of public service, P.S/ Office of the President.

A Buganda Post reader and Facebook member in the UK informed us that Kabaka Muwenda Mutebi II is on Facebook, more evidence to his subjects of how technology savvy he is. When we contacted sources close to Banda Palace, we learnt that Kabaka Mutebi has been an avid computer and Internet user since the early 1990s, “exchanging tons of emails each day and doing a lot of Web research, to keep abreast of global developments.”

Below is the message on Kabaka Mutebi’s Facebook page:

The Baganda cannot continue to mourn indefinitely for what was lost. We should not continue to labor under the burden of self pity because this self pity will destroy our soul and, therefore, our resolve to rebuild Buganda.

The number of Kabaka Mutebi’s fans is just under 1,200 at the time of posting this story. Click here to access Kabaka Mutebi’s page. If you have problems accessing the page or,  don’t know what Facebook is, or you just don’t have an account, but would like to become a fan, visit www.facebook.com and search on “Kabaka Mutebi” for more details.

The Buganda Post reader who first alerted us to Kabaka’s presence on Facebook, also pointed out that Mr. Museveni’s vice president, Gilbert Bukenya, is one of the fast growing numbers of Facebook users who are Kabaka’s fans. According to our reader: “Bukenya’s message to Kabaka Mutebi opens a lot of questions about Museveni’s VP. First, the terrible spelling of Bukenya suggests that either he is disrespectful of Kabaka or, he is a generally careless and clumsy guy or, he is a 60 year old ‘Muganda’ who cannot write Luganda or address our Kabaka properly. Second, why talk about Buganda as a region, knowing very well that the man he is talking to is the Kabaka of Buganda – a kingdom and not an NRM-style ‘region’. Is he trying to rub Museveni’s ‘central region’ concept into Kabaka Mutebi’s face?”

Dr. Bukenya’s unedited Facebook message to Kabaka Mutebi reads as follows:

Greetings to you Ssabasajja Kabaka W’Buganda. It’s a privilege to find you here. For the time I have been on, I have really appreciated the wonderful people here and all the advice and comments they give. All these are very critical for the development of our regions and the country at large. Wangala Ssabasajja Kabaka – Empologma ya Buganda.

Members of the Olara Otunnu led Campaign for Democracy and Justice in Uganda (CDJ) have explained that the participation of the 4 well known American Baganda is because, during “Ttabamiruka 07 in New Brunswick, New Jersey, the Kabaka of Buganda urged Baganda to work for the acquisition of good governance, we need in Uganda, through seeking alliances and friendship with other ethnicities in Uganda.”

The CDJ document, sent to Buganda Post by Professor Aloysious Lugira, was responding to the posting by Buganda Post contributor, Bijugo Lumu, titled “UPC’s Olara Otunnu Enters ‘Mukago’ With America Baganda”.

The CDJ statement is shown below, without any editing.

Campaign for Democracy and Justice in Uganda
CDJ

CDJ is an organization which belongs to the members of this association. On July 15, 2009 on the Buganda Post website an article written by Chris Bijugo Lumu was published. It was in reaction to a CDJ Press Release dated July 11, 2009, which appeared on the occasion of President Barack’s Accra/Ghana speech. Seeming as if Mr. Chris Bijugo Lumu was reacting out of some sort of hunch, a feeling or suspicion not based on facts, gave his article the title of “UPC’s Olara Otunnu Enters ‘Mukago’ With America Baganda”. He continued on with such allegations that “Olara Otunnu..secured a deal (“mukago”) with respected foreign based Baganda to promote his presidential candidacy”, among other statements.

It is unfortunate that Mr.Lumu chose to comment on the CDJ Press Release July 11, 2009 the way he did. His comments betray the impressions that he did not give a thourough reading of the document. Or if it could have been the case that he was not clear about what he read, he was never bothered to consult the indicated contacts at the end of the Press Release.

Mr. Lumu should do proud to Buganda if he would care to take some refresher courses on the vital Social Anthropology of Buganda. To establish omukago does not mean to “secure a deal” with the sense of okuliira mu kavuyo as his context seem to be implying. CDJ is not about entering mukago as may be reflected in the unfortunate doings of the nineteen sixties. Here we are about associating for the sake of contributing to the return of political sanity in Uganda.

Mr. Lumu emphasizes that “Olara Otunnu, secured a deal with respected foreign based Baganda to promote his presidential candidacy”. In the Press Release it is made categorically clear that “CDJ will not support any parties or candidates in the forthcoming electoral contests. Its preoccupation is to mount a vigorous campaign for genuinely free and fair elections, with a level playing field for all.” http://www.bugandapost.com/main/archives/436
The CDJ is not composed of only the five interim office bearers of the Association. There are many other Ugandans of a variety of backgrounds who are members of CDJ. The four Baganda who on an interim basis are at the head of the organization are there with full knowledge of the intentions of CDJ. Mr. Lumu points out that “CDJ leadership is clearly dominated by Baganda who are known to put Buganda and Kabaka first”. It is true.But these Baganda are there not to dominate, but to serve, with the view in mind of building for the future. In his Keynote speech at Ttabamiruka 07 in New Brunswick, New Jersey, the Kabaka of Buganda urged Baganda to work for the acquisition of good governance, we need in Uganda, through seeking alliances and friendship with other ethnicities in Uganda. http://www.ttabamiruka07.com

Signed by:
Mr. Olara A. Otunnu (Interim Chairman)
Mr. James Ssemakula (Interim Deputy Chairman)
Mr. John Mayanja (Interim President)
Mr. Mubiru Musoke (Interim Treasurer)
Professor Aloysius M.M. Lugira (Interim Secretary)
For further information, contact:
Professor Aloysius M.M. Lugira
Tel: 617-552-3539 or 781-439-3875
E-mail: lugira.cdj@gmail.com or lugira@bc.edu

Send you letters to letters@bugandapost.comas a text email or MS Word document. They must not exceed 500 words in length. If you want us to withold your name write WITHOLD next to it.

If you have an image, audio or video to accompany your letter we will also include it, provided it meets our standards for copyright protection. Send it as an attachment or as a URL link.

We are not obligated to publish any letter. We shall only publish letters which we consider appropriate and suitable for our readership. Click here to see the About page for more information on our terms regarding the content on Buganda Post.

London, UK: What has Owek. Walusimbi Delivered?

Dear editor,

If I remember correctly, the former Katikkiro of Buganda, Owek. Daniel Muliika held Ddamula for 20 months. In that short time, he did many things for his nation. He recovered the land titles for many important Buganda lands across the kingdom. He crashed the Ssemwogere/Museveni regional tier poison and stopped the scam by Mpalanyi Nkoyoyo, Apollo Nsibambi and ‘others still at large’ to divide and sell pieces of Kabaka’s Lubiri to Sudhir and Salim Saleh. But most important, he woke Baganda youth up to understand that Museveni and his NRM were determined to make Baganda slaves or refugees in their own land.

Now, my question is, what has Engineer JB Walusimbi done so far? He cannot claim the 2008 Buganda Conference because it is former acting Katikkiro Ssendaula who copied that idea from the Baganda Ttabamiruka in USA.  The only thing Katikkiro Walusimbi talked consistently about for months is his Museveni funded Omumuli program where he even got Kabaka to distribute maize seeds.  Except now that few farmers planted those seeds he is quiet on Omumuli. The rest of the time, the Katikkiro has either been in secret meetings with Mr. Museveni or complaining against any Muganda who does not love the NRM. Seriously, what will Owek. Walusimbi tell us he has done for Buganda after twenty months in office, which will be a few months from now? And I mean for Buganda, not for Museveni!

Awangaale Ssabajja,

JC Ssempasa,
London

California, USA: Buganda Leadership Vaccum

Gutusinze Ssabasajja.

The leadership gap in Mengo is putting Buganda at a very big risk because even here in the diaspora we are starting to have NRM and fake Baganda take over our organizations.  In London, Boston and Washington DC we now have people who are much more loyal to NRM and Museveni than to Namulondo, taking over Baganda organizations.

Ai Ssabasajja we were first shocked to hear that some people who are suspected to be  funded by Uganda tax payer money disorganized the Gwangamujje of Boston elections two month ago. Then came word that  during the Gwangamujje of Washington DC elections a few weeks ago they allowed non-members, visitors and even children to vote.  Unbelievable but true is the fact that the returning officer who supposedly ruled all these irregularities legal (NRM style) is Omulangira Kalema, the Kabaka’s representative in Washington DC.  This taking over of Baganda organizations is already paying off for Mr. Museveni and his people. I have read news that his ambassador Perez Kamunanirwe has been invited to preside over Buganda Day on June 27, 2009. Yet, when Buganda Day was started in DC, it was to remember Baganda heroes, starting with Ssekabaka Luwangula Muteesa II, who have died while defending your kingdom against Ugandan governments.

Magulunyondo, what is happening in London and USA with Balangira betraying Namulondo and some Baganda thinking that they cannot do anything without involving NRM or Banyankore and Banyarwanda is a result of “the surrender” at Mengo.  Cuucu, we pray that God may bless and guide you to a decision that can deal with the weak leadership at Mengo.

Wangaala nnyo Sabasajja.

Name Witheld (on request)
California, USA

Send you letters to letters@bugandapost.com as a text email or MS Word document. They must not exceed 500 words in length. If you want us to withold your name write WITHOLD next to it.

If you have an image, audio or video to accompany your letter we will also include it, provided it meets our standards for copyright protection. Send it as an attachment or as a URL link.

We are not obligated to publish any letter. We shall only publish letters which we consider appropriate and suitable for our readership. See the About page for more information on our terms regarding the content on Buganda Post.

Moses Musana: Abakenyi, Buganda Future, Appeal to Katikkiro

Dear BP,

I wish to tell my fell Baganda about my people and our concern about our future.  I am one of the Baganda group called Abakenyi or Abakeni. A long time ago our Baganda ancestors run away to Bugerere, Busoga and Teso because of problems with the Kabaka at that time. Over the last 10 years our elders are working to bring us back into the Baganda community and some progress has happened but not enough. But for  most of us our future is best back in Buganda because we are Baganda. That is why we are worried about the future of Buganda, because it should be our future too.

One reason why President Museveni manages to create division in Baganda is that when he bribes Banyala or Baluuli leaders to demand separation from Buganda, the Katikkiro and his government only quarrel and complain. But they should do research and show that staying in Buganda is much better. Here in Bugerere Banyala are not the majority and most even prefer to be part of Buganda. But the people in Mengo are not willing or able to get these facts and use them in public relations. They think that strengthening Baganda is taking Museveni money and giving people hoes and seeds. They don’t realize that Museveni wants them to stay on hoes and seeds while he settles Banyankore, Banyarwanda and Sudanese in places like Bugerere. When Katikiro Walusimbi brings Kabaka Mutebi to Bugerere to give out hoes and seeds, it is possible that more of Museveni’s Sudanese will get the items than Baganda (Banyala and Bakenyi included) because of local LC and police connections. Banyankore, Bakiga or Banyarwanda control most  police posts in Buganda and share bribes with local LCs.

I appeal to Katikiro Walusimbi to look in his heart and start working for the true Buganda. The true Buganda are the Baganda communities who are 95% very poor and being terrorized by Mr. Museveni’s policies on corruption, money laundering, land grabbing and giving nearly all local security control in Buganda to people from the West.  Katikiro, you should embrace all Buganda’s native communities like Banyala, Baruli, Bakenyi, Bavuma, etc. and use them as key members of  Buganda. You should also make clear what long-term future Mengo is working on for Buganda, so that all of us can know what to expect which is not Museveni’s “Buganda becomes Central Region and Kabaka Goes” future. Right now, the future you talk is only 3 months long – the next harvest of beans from the seeds Kabaka is giving out in the Omumuli program.  If the rains do not come and the beans die, what happens next? Are we not talking about who will get the feet of our cow when we kill it while thieves are running away with the whole animal?

Awangaale Sabasajja.

Moses Musana
8 May 09

Badru Kazibwe: Thanks and Praying for Buganda

Dear Sir/Madam,

I want to thank you very much for making the chance for Baganda to say what they feel without censuring. The English and Luganda newspapers is Uganda today will never print a letter from if it deeply talks about what Baganda must do to become free. They only allow letters praising Museveni or making the usual weak complaining about land, 2011 elections and federo. 

I pray that many Baganda will use the chance to tell everyone about the way Museveni and his people have robbed our country Buganda which now has nothing. Also, that you will be able to have Kabaka Mutebi and Owek. Walusimbi to read these letters and know live what is really going on with Baganda.

Wangaala Ssabasajja.

Badru Kazibwe, Boston.

We have listened to Buganda Post readers and will do what you have asked. We will start publishing your letters without editing, except for minimal grammar and spelling corrections . And if you have an image, audio or video file to accompany your letter we will also include it, provided it meets our standards for copyright protection. Finally, your letter must not exceed 500 words (use the Wordcount command in MS Word) and paragraphs must be separated by blank lines.

Send you letters to letters@bugandapost.com as a text email or MS Word document.  Send image, audio and video as attachments or URL links.

We are not obligated to publish any letter. We shall only publish letters which we consider appropriate and suitable for our readership. See the About page for more information on our terms regarding the content on Buganda Post.

C Bijugo Lumu